Keadilan buat mangsa

Keadilan buat mangsa

Thursday, November 1, 2012

SUARAM questionable plaintiff status and a lying legal firm


Plaintiff status rejected

On October 11, The Malaysian Insiders reported the President of the Young Journalists Club, Dzulkarnain Taib claiming SUARAM misrepresented itself as a plaintiff to a French inquiry of the multi-billion Scorpene submarine deal.

He alleged SUARAM lied to the public in Malaysia when they claimed to have been accepted or recognised as ‘civil party’ (plaintiff).

A court document “No du Parquet:1115196025 and No Instruction: 2292/12/4” dated March 13 this year, signed by the French judiciary, had rejected SUARAM as plaintiff for the Scorpene inquiry. It means that Scorpene case raised by SUARAM  has been thrown out by the French court since March 2012.

SUARAM’s lawyers had applied for the human rights watchdog to be made a “joint civil party” (joint plaintiff) together with the International Federation for Human Rights, based on a court document “No Parquet: 1115106025 and No Instruction: 20F/11/52” dated March 16 this year.

The French judiciary have yet to decide on whether to allow SUARAM to be a joint plaintiff over the inquiry into the Scorpene deal.

Law firm supply false info

In the meanwhile, Bernama yesterday reported Members of Parliamanet, Wee Choo Keong claiming that a law firm in Kuala Lumpur had furnished false information on SUARAM to lawyers in France.

In a letter, it had stated that Suara Rakyat Malaysia (Suaram) was a registered organisation under Suara Inisiatif Sendirian Berhad (SISB).

He further alleged that this law firm appears to have a grand design to tarnish our country's image. However, he questioned why there has been no legal action against Suaram despite the investigation on the NGO which started a month ago.

Domestic Trade, Cooperative and Consumerism Minister Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri Yaakob then replied that his Ministry was informed the Attorney-General (AG) had wanted to obtain a report from the Registrar of Societies first. The AG wants to prove monies received by SISB was channeled to Suaram.

4 comments:

  • Pe'ah says:
    November 1, 2012 at 9:43:00 AM GMT+8

    Kalau ya pon, takkan la lame sangat agency kerajaan nak bertindak? Susah sangat ke kerja ni? Ke ade agenda lain?

  • Pasquale says:
    November 1, 2012 at 10:12:00 AM GMT+8

    Datuk Sabri Ismail ni memang ada agenda lain yang sama dengan agenda BABI!

  • Dhanyaraam says:
    November 1, 2012 at 10:41:00 AM GMT+8

    SUARAM ni patut igantung...haraamkan NGO yg dapat dana dari Soros...ini adalah taktik terbaru Anwar untuk menjtuhkan kerajaan BN dgn bawa masuk anasir jahat dari luar!! harap KDN akan bertindak dengan tegas

  • Anonymous says:
    November 1, 2012 at 10:53:00 AM GMT+8

    Tunggu sampai PRU 13 nanti mungkin org last minute tunjuk semua fakta kpd public, langsung tak beri masa kpd PR untuk create cerita lain.

fda

Get your volunteer initiatve funded!

Link2Me WeLinkBk (254)