UNSPIN: Pertuduhan Anwar dan kesalahan meliwat

Oleh Teruna Kelana

Beberapa bulan lepaih, ada satu wakil rakyat PKR nama Manikavasagam menyatakan undang-undang liwat adalah ketidakadilan yang diwarisi dari penjajah British.

Entah segi apa yang dikatakan, saya tak mahu faham. Undang-undang luar tabii mempunyai asas kepada tradisi nilai budaya setempat dan hukum ugama. Itu juga asas norma pembikinan undang-undang. Jadi tak boleh dilayan kegilaan wakil rakyat Hindraf ini.

Baik kita tumpu lani pada pertuduhan sebenar. Baca surat pertuduhan berikut:


SEKSYEN-SEKSYEN YANG RELEVAN DALAM KANUN KESEKSAAN:

UNSUR JENAYAH:

Carnal intercourse against the order of nature

377A. Any person who has sexual connection with another person by the introduction of the penis into the anus or mouth of the other person is said to commit carnal intercourse against the order of nature.

[Explanation — Penetration is sufficient to constitute the sexual connection necessary to the offence described in this section. Punishment for committing carnal intercourse against the order of nature]

HUKUMAN:

Punishment for committing carnal intercourse against the order of nature

377B. Whoever voluntarily commits carnal intercourse against the order of nature shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to twenty years, and shall also be liable to whipping

MELIWAT TANPA KERELAAN MANGSA:

Committing carnal intercourse against the order of nature without consent, etc.

377C. Whoever voluntarily commits carnal intercourse against the order of nature on another person without the consent, or against the will, of the other person, or by putting the other person in fear of death or hurt to the person or any other person, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term of not less than five years and not more than twenty years, and shall also be liable to whipping.

Secara lalu, pendakwaraya, polis dan Saiful perlu membuktikan Anwar telah masukkan anu kedalam dubur dan membuktikan terdapat elemen paksaan. My words against your words atau ada bukti dan saki?

Ini yang perlu diperbicarakan. Bukan dok konar turun naik mahkamah rendah dan mahkamah tinggi? Bukan dok kata laporan perubatan dah boleh buang kes? Bukan perlu wayangkan penolakkan perjalanan ke Washington atau Perth?

Cepat bicara, cepat settle.